0%

Review

In the vast expanse of mobile games, "State of Survival: Survive the Zombie Apocalypse" emerges as a beacon for those who revel in strategy, survival, and the thrills of a post-apocalyptic world riddled with the undead. Developed by KingsGroup Holdings, the game offers a blend of city-building, tactical warfare, and alliance diplomacy set...

State of Survival: Survive the Zombie Apocalypse

  • Greg Burn

In the vast expanse of mobile games, "State of Survival: Survive the Zombie Apocalypse" emerges as a beacon for those who revel in strategy, survival, and the thrills of a post-apocalyptic world riddled with the undead. Developed by KingsGroup Holdings, the game offers a blend of city-building, tactical warfare, and alliance diplomacy set against the backdrop of a world overrun by zombies. Since its launch, the game has attracted a dedicated following, bringing avid gamers together with its compelling blend of survival mechanics and community-driven gameplay.

"State of Survival" provides players with the challenge of rebuilding society amidst chaos. You are not just a survivor fighting off waves of zombies; you are a leader, a planner, and a strategist entrusted with ensuring the survival and prosperity of your fledgling settlement. The game sets itself apart by fusing the urgency of survival with the satisfaction of base development and cooperative play, making for an experience that goes beyond the traditional expectations for a zombie-themed mobile game.

Building a Safe Haven Amidst the Ruins

Central to the gameplay is the responsibility of base development—the heart of your survivor community. As in most strategy survival games, players collect resources, build facilities, and upgrade their infrastructure to create a bastion against the zombie hordes. Researching new technologies and training troops form the crux of long-term survival, while immediate threats must be addressed through tactical defenses and vigilant exploration.

Navigating the Horde

Combat in "State of Survival" straddles the line between accessibility and complexity. Players deploy heroes, each with unique abilities, to fight against zombies and rival survivors. The strategic element in arranging your heroes and troops for each skirmish offers depth, though, in practice, many battles can become rote exercises once optimal strategies are discovered.

Alliances and Social Constructs

To survive the apocalypse, players must often band together, and "State of Survival" emphasizes this through its alliance mechanics. Alliances allow for mutual support, coordinated attacks, and a communal effort in events, adding a compelling social dimension that encourages cooperation and communication among players.

Weaknesses within the State of Survival

While the game boasts a rich and engaging experience, it is not without its kinks. One such issue is the pacing, which can dip due to the time-gated nature of building and upgrading—oftentimes pushing players towards in-app purchases to expedite progress. The "freemium" model risks disrupting game balance, leading to a "pay-to-survive" sentiment that can overshadow skill and strategy.

Another critique is the repetitive nature of some gameplay elements. Certain tasks and missions can become monotonous over time, requiring a rinse-and-repeat approach that may not provide sufficient variety to keep all players engaged. Moreover, balancing issues with troop power and hero abilities can create disparities in battle outcomes, yielding frustration for those who feel outmatched despite their efforts.

Further, some players have raised concerns about customer support and technical issues. Bug reports and account problems can be met with less attentiveness than desired, leading to a suboptimal experience for those affected.

The Survivors' Verdict

The players of "State of Survival" are a diverse community, but many share a positive outlook on the game, applauding its robust combination of strategy, storytelling, and alliance play. The depth of base building and customization receives particular praise, allowing players to truly feel like architects of their own survival story.

However, despite the enthusiasm, there remains a portion of the player base that expresses frustration with the game's monetization strategies. The reliance on in-app purchases for rapid progression can be disheartening and sometimes seen as a pay-for-advantage system. But supporters argue that with patience and strategic play, the game remains enjoyable without excessive spending.

Engagement with the game is kept alive through frequent updates, new events, and a continued dialogue between the developers and the community, suggesting a commitment to the game's evolution and improvement. As it stands, "State of Survival" carves its own identity amongst a crowded genre, establishing a loyal fanbase with its distinctive take on the zombie survival narrative.

Pros:
  • Strategic base-building provides depth and satisfaction
  • The alliance system promotes teamwork and social interaction
  • The diverse array of heroes and troops for varied tactical combat
  • Engaging post-apocalyptic narrative and world-building
Cons:
  • Progression can feel slow without in-app purchases
  • Gameplay can become repetitive over time
  • Some balancing issues may disadvantage non-paying players
  • Customer support and technical glitches need improvement
  • Monetization strategies can overshadow gameplay for some
90%
90%
90%
90%